<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>West Virginia Green Works</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wvgreenworks.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wvgreenworks.org</link>
	<description>Rethink. Retrain. Reclaim.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:53:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sustainability Drives Innovation</title>
		<link>http://wvgreenworks.org/sustainability-drives-innovation/</link>
		<comments>http://wvgreenworks.org/sustainability-drives-innovation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 21:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wvgreenworks.org/?p=405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Turns out, many of us in the Mountain State agree with the folks who wrote that article in the Harvard Business Review titled Why Sustainability is Now the Key Driver for Innovation. We think sustainability-driven innovation is an exciting framework to operate within, offering a variety of opportunties to West Virginians to control their own destiny by retraining, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Turns out, many of us in the Mountain State agree with the <a href="http://hbr.org/2009/09/why-sustainability-is-now-the-key-driver-of-innovation/ar/1" target="_blank">folks</a> who wrote that article in the Harvard Business Review titled <a href="http://hbr.org/2009/09/why-sustainability-is-now-the-key-driver-of-innovation/ar/1" target="_blank">Why Sustainability is Now the Key Driver for Innovation</a>. We think sustainability-driven innovation is an exciting framework to operate within, offering a variety of opportunties to West Virginians to control their own destiny by retraining, retooling and innovating while improving quality of life for themselves and others.</p>
<p>The GreenWorks mission is to equip as many West Virginians with the knowledge, skills, and mentorship they need to prosper in the new and green economies.  We&#8217;ll work to inform, train and assist everyone interested in the growth of triple-bottom-line endeavors, sustainability-driven innovation, and green job and business development.</p>
<p>Give us a shout if you know of a great event, business or training that supports green economy growth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wvgreenworks.org/sustainability-drives-innovation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Energy Efficient Building Codes Get the Shaft in House Committee</title>
		<link>http://wvgreenworks.org/energy-efficient-building-codes-get-the-shaft-in-house-committee/</link>
		<comments>http://wvgreenworks.org/energy-efficient-building-codes-get-the-shaft-in-house-committee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 21:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wvgreenworks.org/?p=402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Leslee McCarty WVEC Lobbyist Last year, we worked hard in concert with the Governor’s office to make sure West Virginia was in good position to receive federal stimulus dollars targeted to energy conservation programs. In order to receive these monies, the governor had to assure the federal government that we were going to implement [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><em>By <a href="http://www.wvecouncil.org/legisupdate/2010/02_26.html#enef" target="_blank">Leslee McCarty</a></em><br />
<em>WVEC Lobbyist</em></p>
<p>Last year, we worked hard in concert with the Governor’s office to make sure West Virginia was in good position to receive federal stimulus dollars targeted to energy conservation programs. In order to receive these monies, the governor had to assure the federal government that we were going to implement the most recent International building Efficiency Codes, and a new building codes statute for the state was passed.</p>
<p>Great, right?</p>
<p>As far as last year, fine. As far as rules are concerned. not so great.</p>
<p>TheWest Virginia Homebuilders Association entered this session with a plan to change the law by changing the rules, so they got the Rule Making Review Committee to amend the building code rule and all of a sudden, we were back to the 2003 code that is now in effect.</p>
<p>So we had to go to House Judiciary last week on short notice and we lost the vote. Even with the &#8220;help&#8221; of the testimony of West Virginia Division of Energy chief Jeff Herholdt, Delegates Doug Skaff (D-Kanawha), Kelly Sobonya (R-Cabell) and others managed to defeat an attempt by Delegates Barbara Fleischauer (D-Monongalia) and Bill Wooton (D-Raleigh) to put the code back to the most recent version.</p>
<p>Now the Governor’s office is working to remedy this problem in Senate Judiciary, but it is not clear what the outcome will be.</p>
<p>What is clear is that West Virginia will probably lose future federal energy efficiency grants because we let the Homebuilders rewrite the rules for laws the Legislature passed last year!!</p>
<p>And it is also clear to us that many of our legislators do not understand what &#8220;green buildings&#8221; are and that they save taxpayers and homeowners money and help reduce our carbon emissions by lowering heating and cooling costs.</p>
<p>This is &#8220;penny wise and pound foolish&#8221;government at its best, and very sad to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wvgreenworks.org/energy-efficient-building-codes-get-the-shaft-in-house-committee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three-Week Weatherization Training Success</title>
		<link>http://wvgreenworks.org/three-week-weatherization-training-success/</link>
		<comments>http://wvgreenworks.org/three-week-weatherization-training-success/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 21:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wvgreenworks.org/?p=399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MARTINSBURG &#8211; There was plenty to celebrate Friday, when students, staff and supporters of the Mid-Atlantic Weatherization and Green Jobs Training Center gathered locally for a graduation luncheon. Although the event focused on the first eight graduates&#8217; success, it also was a time to celebrate news that the program&#8217;s been approved for an apprenticeship program. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>MARTINSBURG &#8211; There was plenty to celebrate Friday, when students, staff and supporters of the Mid-Atlantic Weatherization and Green Jobs Training Center gathered locally for a graduation luncheon.</p>
<p>Although the event focused on the first eight graduates&#8217; success, it also was a time to celebrate news that the program&#8217;s been approved for an apprenticeship program.</p>
<p>Rick Smith, executive director of Eastern West Virginia Community Action Agency, which oversees the program, agreed there are many reasons to celebrate it and the first graduates&#8217; futures.</p>
<p>He said the three-week training is designed to teach participants &#8220;everything they need to know to go into an apprenticeship program for weatherization.&#8221;</p>
<p>In the end, participants will be better prepared for employment, Smith said.</p>
<p>&#8220;As of now, they have learned the physics of hot and cold and how it affects a house, as well as how air exchange affects the heating and cooling of a house. They have also learned basic carpentry concepts, such as how a wall is constructed and what happens when you build a wall in certain ways. They&#8217;ve also learned about insulation and how spots that are lacking insulation can cause problems and airflow issues,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>Participants also learned the &#8220;theory of weatherization,&#8221; Smith said.</p>
<p>&#8220;That was all covered in the first two weeks. So from there, in the third week, they&#8217;ve actually gone from the theory to the job site to do hands-on work, to see if it is actually what they thought it would be,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>Larry Searcy, director of the Martinsburg One-Stop Career Center, where the training center is housed, said word was &#8220;just received Wednesday from the federal Department of Labor that we&#8217;ve been approved now as an official apprenticeship program for weatherization technician.&#8221;</p>
<p>That means the individuals who&#8217;ve gone through this weatherization program can &#8220;now enter into an apprenticeship program which will run 2,002 hours, or roughly a year, and get paid. So they&#8217;ll be paid to learn as they do, out in the field,&#8221; Searcy said.</p>
<p>After completing the apprenticeship, they will have earned a DOL-approved apprenticeship certificate, he said.</p>
<p>Searcy said this represents a &#8220;big step forward&#8221; for the program and its participants.</p>
<p>&#8220;We now have eight people, who have finished pre-apprenticeship training, and we anticipate seven or eight of those people going on to the apprenticeship, which is a nearly 100 percent placement rate and that is unheard of,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>Participants should have an easier time getting jobs, thanks to this apprenticeship program, Searcy said.</p>
<p>&#8220;When they go to a weatherization program, either here in the area or around the state, they can produce documentation that&#8217;s recognized all over the country as being absolutely trained and prepared to do that job,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>Smith agreed this will be good for the participants&#8217; future career paths.</p>
<p>&#8220;First of all, during the apprenticeship, they will actually be paid for working, which is good. And they will also be building a skill set and resume, while they&#8217;re in a paid program,&#8221; Smith said.</p>
<p>Instructor Mike Sites couldn&#8217;t have been happier with the caliber of students chosen to participate in the program&#8217;s inaugural class.</p>
<p>&#8220;This whole group really exceeded my expectations. I mean with them, we really hit the jackpot. All the people who were in the class were able to go through the material, understand it and do a good job of making a diagnosis in the field &#8211; which is something that seasoned crew members can&#8217;t always do that,&#8221; Sites said.</p>
<p>Martinsburg resident Augusta Fleming, who was one of the graduates, is no stranger to this type of activity since she previously participated in another program for women who wish to enter the field of construction, she said.</p>
<p>&#8220;Really, I&#8217;ve always been interested in this type of work, especially since I first started doing welding with my dad when I was just 16 years old. What I really liked about this program is that it&#8217;s so different because of the focus on green technology and energy savings,&#8221; Fleming said.</p>
<p>Another participant, Sue Shamburg of Martinsburg, said she&#8217;d eventually like to use her newly acquired skills and expertise to become an auditor/estimator.</p>
<p>&#8220;That&#8217;s the professional who goes into a home or building before the weatherization team,&#8221; Shamburg said. &#8220;They go in and see what needs to be done. For example, how efficiently the furnace is running and if any insulation is needed, then fill out a report so they will know what should be done,&#8221; she said.</p>
<p>Berkeley County Commissioner Tony Petrucci, who spoke to the graduates, said he was impressed with the program and what it offers participants.</p>
<p>It is an example of what can be accomplished when governmental agencies work together for the collective good, he said.</p>
<p>&#8220;This really does show what can happen when everyone works together, from the students to the folks from Workforce West Virginia, Community Action and Telamon. They all worked to get this program rolling, and it is just a great opportunity so that these young people will be able to use their knowledge out in the community,&#8221; Petrucci said.</p>
<p>These types of training programs are especially valuable during times of high unemployment, he said.</p>
<p>&#8220;With the unemployment rate being so bad throughout the Eastern Panhandle, this type of training program and Workforce center actually provides a hands-on opportunity so that if an employer wants these people, they are ready to go to work,&#8221; Petrucci said.</p>
<p>Jenni Vincent   <a href="http://www.journal-news.net/page/content.detail/id/533182.html">Source</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wvgreenworks.org/three-week-weatherization-training-success/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Davis and Elkins College Launches Campus-Wide Recycling Program</title>
		<link>http://wvgreenworks.org/davis-and-elkins-college-launches-campus-wide-recycling-program/</link>
		<comments>http://wvgreenworks.org/davis-and-elkins-college-launches-campus-wide-recycling-program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 21:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wvgreenworks.org/?p=396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Davis &#38; Elkins College &#8220;GreenWorks!&#8221; student organization and The Center for Sustainability Studies (CSS) have launched a dormitory recycling program on campus. The two organizations recently hosted a bin assembly party so that new, colorful and functional bins can be placed in every suite, hall and floor. According to CSS Director Russ McClain, adviser [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The Davis &amp; Elkins College &#8220;GreenWorks!&#8221; student organization and The Center for Sustainability Studies (CSS) have launched a dormitory recycling program on campus. The two organizations recently hosted a bin assembly party so that new, colorful and functional bins can be placed in every suite, hall and floor.</p>
<p>According to CSS Director Russ McClain, adviser to Greenworks!, this effort is being organized in cooperation with Randolph County&#8217;s new recycling program, which will now accept plastics.</p>
<p>&#8220;We have been working closely with Mr. Tim Hornick of the Randolph County Solid Waste Authority (RCSWA), Mr. Joe Gumm of the Randolph County Recycle Center and Tygarts Valley Sanitation (TVS) to explore ways to recycle plastics in Randolph County,&#8221; McClain said. &#8220;The enthusiasm and willingness of the campus to recycle plastic was instrumental in creating the mechanism to do so in the county; with the partnership of the RCSWA and TVS to thank for ultimately making it possible.&#8221;</p>
<p>Every plastic container has a number on the bottom, and those marked No. 1 and No. 2 are acceptable for recycling. Lids must be removed for safety in the compaction process. Although Randolph County cannot accept glass containers at this time, it will recycle aluminum, steel, tin, magazines, office paper, newspaper and notepaper.</p>
<p>The new Davis &amp; Elkins initiative will collect items from all five of the college&#8217;s residence halls. With help from D&amp;E&#8217;s housekeeping and maintenance staff, items will be moved from the bins to the public recycling trailer on campus every week. The bins were purchased with assistance from D&amp;E&#8217;s Student Assembly as well as the CSS. Additional outdoor and building lobby containers are expected to be in place by April.</p>
<p>The Center for Sustainability Studies has also partnered with Steve Kerns of the RCSWA and the Tygart Valley Outdoor Youth Club, to initiate a volunteer-run curbside recycling program in the city of Elkins. Currently, volunteers are picking up materials the first Saturday of the month in the Wees Historic District, which is next to the college. McClain says this initiative has been successful enough to allow the group to expand curbside recycling to other areas in the city, starting with the Bridgewater and Riverview neighborhoods on the second Saturday of March.</p>
<p>The Center for Sustainability Studies was founded at Davis &amp; Elkins this fall, thanks to a grant from the Naylor Family Trust. The three-year grant is funding development of an academic major and a minor in Sustainability Studies and center for community and regional education, research and outreach. It is currently housed on the fourth floor of Eshleman Science Center. For more information, call 304-637-1309 or email <a href="mailto:css@davisandelkins.edu">css@davisandelkins.edu</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://theintermountain.com/page/content.detail/id/526676.html?nav=5008" target="_blank">Source</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wvgreenworks.org/davis-and-elkins-college-launches-campus-wide-recycling-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opportunities for Public Comment</title>
		<link>http://wvgreenworks.org/opportunities-for-public-comment/</link>
		<comments>http://wvgreenworks.org/opportunities-for-public-comment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 21:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wvgreenworks.org/?p=392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DEP Seeks Input on Narrative Criteria Protocol In a recent press release, WV Department of Environmental Protection Secretary Randy Huffman announced that the agency is in the process of establishing a protocol for implementing and enforcing the state’s narrative water quality criteria, as required under the federal Clean Water Act. As part of that process [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><strong>DEP Seeks Input on Narrative Criteria Protocol</strong></p>
<p>In a recent press release, WV Department of Environmental Protection Secretary Randy Huffman announced that the agency is in the process of establishing a protocol for implementing and enforcing the state’s narrative water quality criteria, as required under the federal Clean Water Act.</p>
<p>As part of that process for establishing a state protocol, the DEP is researching what other states are doing as well as seeking input from interested parties within the state. “The protocol we establish will be our own, but we want to give those who want to propose a solution the opportunity to have their ideas considered,” Huffman said.</p>
<p>Those who would like to submit ideas or scientific theories for how the agency should implement and enforce the narrative water quality standard are invited to do so by <strong>March 26</strong>. All submissions will be placed on the agency’s website for public review.</p>
<p>“Water quality has become the main topic of conversation across all types of industry, and there is a great deal of debate about what is or should be considered impairment,” Huffman said. “Our goal is to take into consideration the ideas of others as we develop our plan for implementing and enforcing the narrative standard.”</p>
<p>“What I am looking for are well-thought-out ideas on how we can measure aquatic life impacts and tie those impacts back to the problem where we can then fix it, using the tools of the Clean Water Act,” Huffman added.</p>
<p>The press release went out on this on March 3, so the March 26 deadline is very short turnaround time, making it unclear just how “official” this comment period is. But submissions can be emailed to DEP.<a href="http://www.wvecouncil.org/take_action/2010/comments@wv.gov" target="_blank">comments@wv.gov</a> or mailed to: The Department of Environmental Protection, 601 57th Street SE, Charleston, WV 25304.</p>
<hr />
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><a name="psc"></a>PSC Comment Period on Net Metering Ends April 4th </strong></p>
<p>Here is another comment period with a quick turnaround time.</p>
<p>The WV Public Service Commission has proposed new Net Metering Rules, which  include eligibility, technical, interconnection, metering, tariff filing and reporting requirements relating to net metering.</p>
<p>The proposed rules are contained in PSC General Order No. 258, and can be found on the Internet <a href="http://www.wvecouncil.org/take_action/2010/e=%27WebDocket" target="_blank">here.</a></p>
<p>Any interested person or corporation may file specific written comments on the proposed amended rules by <strong>April 4, 2010, by 4:OO p.m.,</strong> to Sandra Squire, Executive Secretary, Public Service Commission of West Virginia, Post Office Box 812, Charleston, West Virginia 25323. Replies to comments may be filed no later than May 5, 2010 by 4:OO pm.</p>
<p>Any party seeking a hearing on the proposed rules shall make a specific written request by <strong>March 30,2010</strong> and explicitly state the grounds upon which the request for a hearing is made.</p>
<hr />
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><a id="dep1" name="dep1"></a>DEP Emergency Water Quality Rule for Weirton Steel </strong></p>
<p>The WV DEP’s Division of Water and Waste Management has scheduled a public hearing and comment period on emergency rule changes to 47CSR2, “Requirements Governing Water Quality Standards.” The DEP proposes an emergency rule to make a site-specific exception to the half-mile rule so that it shall not apply to the Ohio River main channel (between Brown’s Island and the left descending bank) between river mile points 61.0 and 63.5.  The site-specific exemption currently in the rule expires September 1, 2010, and involves the Category A water quality standards for iron at the former Weirton Steel facility.</p>
<p>The public hearing will take place<strong> April 1</strong> at 6 p.m. at the DEP’s headquarters, located at 601 57th Street SE, Charleston, WV  25304 in the Coopers Rock Training Room.  In addition to oral comments provided at the hearing, the agency will accept written comments at any time up to <strong>April 5, 2010.</strong>  No comments will be accepted after that date.  Written comments may be submitted to Kathy Cosco, Public Information Office, at the above address.  Comments may also be e-mailed to <a href="http://www.wvecouncil.org/take_action/2010/Linda.B.Keller@wv.gov" target="_blank">Linda.B.Keller@wv.gov</a></p>
<p>Comments will be made part of the record.  Copies of the emergency rule and other rule documents are available from the Secretary of State’s office or from the agency at <a href="http://www.dep.wv.gov/WWE/Programs/wqs/Pages/WQSpublicmeetings.aspx" target="_blank">http://www.dep.wv.gov/WWE/Programs/wqs/Pages/WQSpublicmeetings.aspx</a>.  You may also obtain hardcopies of this information by calling Gloria Shaffer at (304)926-0499, ext. 1033.</p>
<hr />
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><a name="dep2"></a>DEP Accepting Public Comment on Impaired Streams List</strong></p>
<p>The WV DEP has developed a draft list of West Virginia’s impaired streams and lakes (commonly known as the 303[d] list). DEP is required by the federal EPA to update its list of impaired waters every two years. The list is compiled from readily available information and serves as an inventory of waters for which clean up plans must be developed.</p>
<p>An “impaired water” is a water body, which, due to a pollutant or combination of pollutants, fails to meet state water quality standards.  By violating applicable water quality standards, impaired waters fail to support one or more of their designated uses such as, public drinking water supply, aquatic life propagation, or contact recreation.</p>
<p>In order to allow public participation in the listing process, a public comment period began March 15. The comment period ends <strong>April 19, 2010</strong>.</p>
<p>Comments may be submitted by e-mail to <a href="http://www.wvecouncil.org/take_action/2010/Stephen.A.Young@wv.gov" target="_blank">Stephen.A.Young@wv.gov</a> or via U.S. mail to:<br />
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection<br />
Division of Water and Waste Management<br />
2010 303(d) List – Attn: Stephen A. Young<br />
601 57th Street, S.E.<br />
Charleston, WV 25304</p>
<p>The draft West Virginia 2010 Section 303(d) List may be viewed on DEP’s Web site,<br />
<a href="http://www.dep.wv.gov/WWE/WATERSHED/IR/Pages/default.aspx" target="_blank">http://www.dep.wv.gov/WWE/WATERSHED/IR/Pages/default.aspx</a></p>
<p>For more information about the impaired stream list, please contact Steve Young at (304) 926-0495.</p>
<hr />
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><a name="epa"></a>EPA Launches Web Forum on How to Best Protect America’s Waters </strong></p>
<p>The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is seeking public input on how the agency can better protect and improve the health of our waters.</p>
<p>For a two- week period, EPA is holding a Web discussion forum on how the nation can better manage some of the most significant water pollution problems facing our nation. The feedback received on the online forum will help shape the discussion at EPA’s upcoming conference in April, “Coming Together for Clean Water,” where EPA will engage approximately 100 executive and local level water leaders on the agency’s clean water agenda.</p>
<p>EPA wants to receive input from water professionals, advocates, and anyone interested in water quality issues about best solution – from planning, scientific tools, low impact development, to green infrastructure and beyond – in controlling water pollution and how resources can be better focused to improve these efforts.</p>
<p>To join the discussion: <a href="http://blog.epa.gov/waterforum/" target="_blank">http://blog.epa.gov/waterforum/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.wvecouncil.org/take_action/2010/03_23.html" target="_blank">Source</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wvgreenworks.org/opportunities-for-public-comment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Renewable Energy Support Wanted in Coalfields</title>
		<link>http://wvgreenworks.org/renewable-energy-support-wanted-in-coalfields/</link>
		<comments>http://wvgreenworks.org/renewable-energy-support-wanted-in-coalfields/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 21:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wvgreenworks.org/?p=389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Chris Shepherd of the JOBS Project, Mingo County:  An open letter to West Virginians with interest in energy and responsible economic development in WV Please see below to take part in passing a resolution on renewable energy that is making its way through the capitol.  As always, try to make your letter and email (if you&#8217;re [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>From Chris Shepherd of the JOBS Project, Mingo County:  An open letter to West Virginians with interest in energy and responsible economic development in WV</p>
<p>Please see below to take part in passing a resolution on renewable energy that is making its way through the capitol.  As always, try to make your letter and email (if you&#8217;re able to swing it) personal and relevant to your profession/economic sector (letterhead would be great!).  Read on, <strong>pass on</strong>, and thanks!</p>
<p>I am writing to ask that you help to encourage development of renewable energy by contacting the state representatives charged with approving legislation that will improve the prospects of renewable energy in West Virginia.</p>
<p>To give you a bit of background, the WV House and Senate both recently passed resolutions expressing a will to study what investment in renewable energy would look like in West Virginia, particularly by examining the Energy Expansion Funds that 20 other states have adopted, funds that specifically stimulate renewable energy and energy efficiency development at the state level (see attached for more details on these very smart and very effective funds).</p>
<p>Though the House and Senate have both passed these resolutions (HCR 107 and SCR 73, respectively), the resolutions still need to clear the Joint Committee on Government and Finance, which are chaired by the Senate President Tomblin and Speaker of the House Thompson, who both need to hear from YOU to ensure that the resolutions are passed out of their committee.</p>
<p>So please, email <span style="text-decoration: underline;">and</span> (even better) write a hard letter to President Earl Ray Tomblin and to Speaker Richard Thompson urging approval of these resolutions.  Simply put, this is currently the best bet for West Virginia to take renewable energy development seriously.</p>
<p>I have attached a <a href="http://wvgreenworks.com/assets/Powering%20West%20Virginia%20Fact%20Sheet.pdf" target="_blank">fact sheet </a>for you to refer to when contacting these leaders, and I have included a sample message below.  Please tailor it to be personal!</p>
<p>Senate President Tomblin&#8217;s email is <a title="mailto:senate.president@wvsenate.gov" href="mailto:senate.president@wvsenate.gov" target="_blank">senate.president@wvsenate.gov</a>, and Speaker Thompson&#8217;s email is <a title="mailto:speaker.thompson@verizon.net" href="mailto:speaker.thompson@verizon.net" target="_blank">speaker.thompson@verizon.net</a>.  Letters should be sent to each at this address:</p>
<p><strong>President Tomblin (or Speaker Thompson)<br />
Joint Committee on Government and Finance<br />
Building 1<br />
Capitol Complex/ Charleston, WV  25305</strong></p>
<p>They will decide whether or not to approve the resolutions in April, so <strong>please send your correspondence soon</strong>!</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Chris Shepherd</p>
<p><strong>SAMPLE:<br />
</strong><br />
Dear Speaker/President:</p>
<p>I am writing to urge you to approve SCR 73 and HCR 107 as co-chair of the Joint Committee on Government and Finance.</p>
<p>Being that West Virginia is a leading energy state, it needs to clearly examine how it can maintain that economic strength through an Energy Expansion Fund, as are utilized in 20 other states.  West Virginia has a wealth of renewable energy opportunities that are currently going unused, opportunities that could create high-paying energy jobs and local economic development across the state.  So again, please approve these studies that would examine how to bolster energy production in West Virginia through an Energy Expansion Fund.</p>
<p>Thank you for your consideration.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wvgreenworks.org/renewable-energy-support-wanted-in-coalfields/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coal Country Catching Wind of Renewable Energy</title>
		<link>http://wvgreenworks.org/coal-country-catching-wind-of-renewable-energy/</link>
		<comments>http://wvgreenworks.org/coal-country-catching-wind-of-renewable-energy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 21:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wvgreenworks.org/?p=386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Renewable energy construction projects can create jobs, even in the heart of coal country. That’s the message Mike McKechnie and Eric Mathis hope to share in Mingo County. McKechnie is bringing knowledge, experience and equipment from his Berkeley Springs-based Mountain View Solar &#38; Winds. His destination is the historic Mountaineer Hotel, a Williamson landmark since [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Renewable energy construction projects can create jobs, even in the heart of coal country.</p>
<p>That’s the message Mike McKechnie and Eric Mathis hope to share in Mingo County. McKechnie is bringing knowledge, experience and equipment from his Berkeley Springs-based Mountain View Solar &amp; Winds. His destination is the historic Mountaineer Hotel, a Williamson landmark since 1925 that also serves as the headquarters for the JOBS (Just Open Businesses that are Sustainable), led by Mathis.</p>
<p>McKechnie was scheduled to speak April 1 to a group of southern West Virginia officials, contractors and electricians on the financial benefits of renewable energy construction.</p>
<p>“We’re talking about creating jobs in Williamson,” Mathis said. “We’re getting a lot of interest from local businesses, and we’re hoping this will be a demonstrative project for this area.”</p>
<p>There’s no reason that can’t happen, according to McKechnie, who said his Eastern Panhandle business has grown steadily since he expanded into solar panel and wind-related projects.</p>
<p>“We want to spread the word to all parts of West Virginia,” McKechnie said. “Building contractors have been hit so hard by this recession. It’s been a terrible thing for a lot of us, but building contractors can be busy. I know that because we are busy. We’ve hired six employees in the last few months, and we’re going to be hiring more this summer. If we can do it, others can, too.”</p>
<p>The workshop, he said, is geared for everyone from government officials and contractors to material supply companies.</p>
<p>“We want this to be model, a good example of what can happen,” he added of the grant-funded Smart Office project.</p>
<p>While in Williamson, McKechnie will demonstrate a solar site analysis and estimate. Considerations will include the available space, priorities, budget and site potential for solar electric generation gain.</p>
<p>“We’re going to serve as a consultant, but we want to use local contractors to do the work,” he added. “We want them to see this as something they can do. It’s more affordable now because the cost of the materials is coming down and the government subsidies.”</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cbs59.com/story.cfm?func=viewstory&amp;storyid=77685" target="_blank">Source</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wvgreenworks.org/coal-country-catching-wind-of-renewable-energy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canaan Valley Institute&#8217;s Research and Education Center Goes for LEED Silver</title>
		<link>http://wvgreenworks.org/canaan-valley-institutes-research-and-education-center-goes-for-leed-silver/</link>
		<comments>http://wvgreenworks.org/canaan-valley-institutes-research-and-education-center-goes-for-leed-silver/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 21:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wvgreenworks.org/?p=384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the folks at Canaan Valley Institute: As one of the first conference facilities in West Virginia to be registered with LEED with a certification goal of Silver, you can breathe easier when you plan your conference or meeting at Canaan Valley Institute’s Research and Education Center, literally. Our facility has been designed using sustainable [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>From the folks at Canaan Valley Institute:</p>
<p>As one of the first conference facilities in West Virginia to be registered with LEED with a certification goal of Silver, you can breathe easier when you plan your conference or meeting at Canaan Valley Institute’s Research and Education Center, literally. Our facility has been designed using sustainable building design technologies, including materials that substantially improve indoor air quality. From locally sourced and recycled materials, to water conservation and treatment, the Research and Education Center will provide a spectacular and environmentally conscious venue for your event or gathering. For more information about CVI’s Research and Education Center, or to reserve the facility for your event, please visit <a title="blocked::http://www.canaanvi.org/canaanvi_web/conference_services.aspx" href="http://www.canaanvi.org/canaanvi_web/conference_services.aspx" target="_blank">http://www.canaanvi.org/canaanvi_web/conference_services.aspx</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wvgreenworks.org/canaan-valley-institutes-research-and-education-center-goes-for-leed-silver/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retrofit Revolution</title>
		<link>http://wvgreenworks.org/retrofit-revolution/</link>
		<comments>http://wvgreenworks.org/retrofit-revolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 21:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wvgreenworks.org/?p=381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By David Sokol In mid-January, the Council of Economic Advisors released its second quarterly report monitoring the impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. As of the close of December 2009, approximately $413 billion of $787 billion had been passed along to residents and businesses in the form of tax reductions and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>By David Sokol</p>
<p>In mid-January, the Council of Economic Advisors released its second quarterly report monitoring the impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. As of the close of December 2009, approximately $413 billion of $787 billion had been passed along to residents and businesses in the form of tax reductions and project commitments. And of that figure, $31 billion had been obligated to clean energy provisions, with the council estimating that another $60 billion or so will be destined for sustainability efforts.</p>
<div id="articleExtras">
<div id="captionA">
<div><img src="http://wvgreenworks.com/assets/green%20jobs%20by%20sector%202000-2013.jpg" alt="" width="620" height="395" align="left" /></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wvgreenworks.org/retrofit-revolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Great &#8220;Environment Versus Economy&#8221; Myth</title>
		<link>http://wvgreenworks.org/the-great-environment-versus-economy-myth/</link>
		<comments>http://wvgreenworks.org/the-great-environment-versus-economy-myth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 21:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wvgreenworks.org/?p=378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By John R. E. Bliese, Ph.D. “We can’t afford any more environmental protection, because it will hurt the economy.” How many times have you heard that line? Probably every time any new standards were proposed to clean up our air or water and protect our health. And every time we try to preserve some rare [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>By John R. E. Bliese, Ph.D.</p>
<div><em>“We can’t afford any more environmental protection, because it will hurt the economy.”</em></div>
<div></div>
<div>How many times have you heard that line? Probably every time any new standards were proposed to clean up our air or water and protect our health. And every time we try to preserve some rare plant or animal we have pushed to the brink of extinction, it’s “owls (or whatever) versus jobs.”</div>
<div></div>
<div>These arguments are the most common ones we face in trying to protect the earth. Politicians spout them freely, and so do business groups and radio talk show entertainers. There is only one problem with these assertions: They are simply not true!</div>
<div></div>
<div>There have been dozens of well-designed studies by economists who have tested these claims, and the results are clear: environmental protection normally has no negative impact on the economy overall, and sometimes it has a positive effect.</div>
<div></div>
<div>What I want to do here is summarize a few of the more notable studies, to show that there is good quality ammunition for us to use when anti-environmentalists trot out those tired old claims.</div>
<div></div>
<div><strong>Look at the States</strong></div>
<div>First, let’s look at the different states within the U.S. Some states have much stricter environmental standards than others. The common belief is that this would hurt the strict states and help the lax ones. But the truth is exactly the opposite, as two comprehensive studies show.</div>
<div>Professor Stephen Meyer of MIT rated all fifty states according to the strictness of their environmental protection policies. He then compared those ratings with indicators of economic health, such as overall growth, employment growth and construction growth, over a period of nearly twenty years. He found exactly the opposite of what the anti-environmentalists claimed: “States with stronger environmental policies consistently out-performed the weaker environmental states on all the economic measures.&#8221;</div>
<div></div>
<div>Shortly after Meyer’s work appeared, a similar study was done by the Institute for Southern Studies in North Carolina. The ISS ranked all fifty states on the strength of their environmental standards, and then ranked them separately on economic indicators. They compared the two rankings and found that “states with the best environmental records also offer the best job opportunities and climate for long-term economic development. The best stewards of the environment also offer workaday citizens the best opportunity for prosperity.”</div>
<div></div>
<div><strong>Look at the National Economy</strong></div>
<div>Next, let’s look at the overall national economy. Some important work has been done by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), a research organization in Paris established by the governments of the industrial democracies, including the United States. It has done several studies recently on the effect of environmental programs on the economies of member countries, and it concludes that there is no evidence of serious economic problems from them. The OECD is doing individual environmental performance reviews of member countries; the one for the U.S. was published in 1996. It finds that our total spending on environmental protection is over 2% of gross domestic product. While this is relatively high, the OECD concludes that “there is no evidence that the economy has been adversely affected as a whole by strong environmental protection policies.”</div>
<div></div>
<div>Robert Repetto, an economist with the World Resources Institute, did a comprehensive industry-by-industry analysis of an enormous amount of data to answer the question: “Jobs, competitiveness, and environmental regulation: What are the real issues?” Within industries, he found that high polluters are no more profitable than low polluters. “There is simply no evidence that superior environmental performance puts firms at a market disadvantage or adversely affects market performance.”</div>
<div></div>
<div>As for jobs, Repetto found virtually no effect. Money spent on environmental protection creates as many jobs as it would if invested elsewhere.</div>
<div>Repetto also found that higher environmental standards in developed countries have not lowered their international competitiveness. There is no evidence of “industrial flight” to third-world countries with few environmental regulations. (In fact, international investment in heavily-regulated industries goes mostly to other advanced countries, which all have strict standards!) Likewise with international trade patterns: there is “no indication that countries with more stringent standards have suffered a loss of international competitiveness.”</div>
<div></div>
<div>Roger Bezdek, an economic consultant, reviewed a number of studies and found that “recent major empirical studies unanimously reject the hypothesis that there is a negative relationship between environmental protection and economic growth. In fact, when statistically significant relationships are found, they are invariably positive. In other words, the U.S. states and nations of the world with more stringent environmental regulations show the best economic performance.”</div>
<div>In a study for the Economic Policy Institute, E. B. Goodstein reviewed twenty years of research on jobs and the environment and found that most economy-wide studies show environmental regulations have resulted in a small increase in total employment. But since a third of all American workers seem to fear for their jobs, he wanted to know how many workers really were laid off because of environmental regulations. He reports on a Dept. of Labor study, which found a total of four plants per year closed for environmental reasons–a grand total of 1,300 jobs lost per year in the entire country! Seven times that many people will be laid off just from the merger of Exxon and Mobil. Goodstein concludes: “Any claim of a trade-off between jobs and the environment is completely without substance. Widespread fears of job loss from environmental protection are simply unfounded.”</div>
<div></div>
<div>Four prominent economists, Adam Jaffe, Steven Peterson, Paul Portney and Robert Stavins, reviewed some 100 different studies of environmental regulation and competitiveness of U.S. manufacturers. They found that, overall, the studies support the conclusions drawn by Repetto and Bezdek: they simply do not show any significant harmful effect on our economy.</div>
<div></div>
<div>On the positive side, Michael Porter of the Harvard Business School has compiled an impressive number of case studies in which new environmental regulations caused companies to redesign products or production processes, in ways that cut pollution and saved the companies lots of money.</div>
<div></div>
<div><strong>Look at the ESA</strong></div>
<div>The one environmental law that generates the most hatred is the Endangered Species Act. Surely, with all the heated controversy it creates, and the resources it supposedly “locks up,” this law has had some serious effects on our economy. Again, the answer is No.</div>
<div></div>
<div>First, those horror stories that some of our Republican politicians were telling a few years ago were so obviously exaggerated that any third-rate high school debater could have shown they were bogus and had no value whatsoever as evidence. Some of them were, in fact, pure fabrications.</div>
<div>In the real world, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service informally reviews thousands of projects that might harm an endangered species. Almost all of them are quickly approved. Only a few turn out to have enough potential for harm to require a formal review, and almost all of those are eventually approved, perhaps with some modifications to protect habitat.</div>
<div></div>
<div>In 1990, for example, FWS examined 28,000 proposed projects. Fewer than 700 of them required a formal review, and less than 1% were found to have a significant impact on an endangered plant or animal. Only two were stopped.</div>
<div></div>
<div>From 1987 through 1991, FWS consulted with other federal agencies on some 96,800 projects. Only 54 were ultimately vetoed. That’s .05%: just one twentieth of one percent!</div>
<div></div>
<div>So few projects run into any problems with the ESA that it could not possibly have much overall impact on the economy. And that is precisely what Stephen Meyer of MIT found in another study. He compared the economic growth of states where there are many endangered species listings with the economic growth of states that have few listings. He found that states with the most endangered species listings had the highest economic growth. Even when differences among the states (such as area and economic size) were taken into account, the results were the same. Professor Meyer concludes: “Anecdotes notwithstanding, the data compel us to reject the argument that higher numbers of endangered species are associated with poor economic performance.”</div>
<div></div>
<div>The explanation, of course, is that even where an endangered species listing blocks some development, it is so localized and so small a factor that it does not even show up on economic measures at the state level.</div>
<div></div>
<div>But what about the really big “train wrecks,” as they are sometimes called? What of the cases where protecting some little creature supposedly had a huge effect on a whole region? There has been only one such case: the northern spotted owl, which stopped almost all logging in the national forests of the Pacific Northwest for several years. So, let’s look at the case of the owl, because there is a lot that the popular media never told us.</div>
<div></div>
<div><strong>“Jobs Versus Owls”</strong></div>
<div>The real issue never was “jobs versus owls.” The real issue was protecting the last of the magnificent ancient forests, which are critical habitat for many species, not just owls. Less than 8% of the ancient forest is left. If the timber companies are so incompetent that they cannot survive on the huge forest land base they have already been given, it is ludicrous to believe that sacrificing our few remaining remnants of ancient forests will save them.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Neverthess, the timber industry and the loggers got lots of publicity by warning that huge numbers of jobs would be lost, all neatly packaged in the slogan “jobs versus owls.” But jobs in the wood products industry have been declining for decades. Even during the 1980s, when the amount of timber harvested increased dramatically, the companies laid off many thousands of workers. The main reason is automation, which requires fewer and fewer workers to cut the trees and saw the logs.</div>
<div></div>
<div>So what actually happened in the years since the spotted owl became protected? The total number of jobs lost in wood products was nowhere close to the industry predictions, but the number of jobs did go down. Blame environmentalists and the owl? No. Professor William Freudenburg and two of his colleagues at the University of Wisconsin recently published a detailed statistical analysis of employment trends in logging and milling in the Northwest. They found that “the 1989 listing of the spotted owl has no significant effect on employment&#8211;not even in the two states where the debate has been the most intense [Oregon and Washington].”</div>
<div></div>
<div>Nor did protecting the owl harm the overall economy of the Northwest. It is the fastest-growing region in the nation, and even in the early 1990s, shortly after the owl became protected, it had some of the lowest unemployment rates in the country.</div>
<div></div>
<div>The “environment versus the economy trade-off” is a myth, even in narrowly economic terms. Note that the studies summarized here only looked for economic impacts of environmental policies&#8211;and found none. They did not count any of the environmental benefits or public health benefits we now have from our efforts to protect the earth.</div>
<div></div>
<div>There are many ways in which our environmental policies can be improved. Let’s not let the old myths stand in our way.</div>
<div align="center">
<hr align="center" size="2" width="100%" />
</div>
<div><strong>Sources referred to in this article</strong></div>
<div><strong>About environmental policies in general&#8230;</strong></div>
<div>Bezdek, Roger H. “Environment and Economy: What’s the Bottom Line?&#8221; Environment 35 (Sept. 1993): 6-11, 25-32.</div>
<div>Goodstein, E.B. Jobs and the Environment: The Myth of a National Trade-Off. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute, 1994.</div>
<div>Hall, Bob. “Gold &amp; Green.” Southern Exposure (Fall 1994): 48-52.</div>
<div>Jaffe, Adam, Steven Peterson, Paul Portney, Robert Stavins. “Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U.S. Manufacturing: What Does the Evidence Tell Us?” Journal of Economic Literature 33 (March 1995): 132-163.</div>
<div>Meyer, Stephen M. Environmentalism and Economic Prosperity: Testing the Environmental Impact Hypothesis. MIT Project on Environmental Politics and Policy, October 5, 1992.</div>
<div>Meyer, Stephen M. Environmentalism and Economic Prosperity: An Update. MIT, February 16, 1993.</div>
<div>OECD (Org. for Economic Cooperation &amp; Development). Environmental Performance in OECD Countries. Environmental Performance Reviews: United States. Integrating Environment and Economy: Progress in the 1990s. All three publications— Paris: 1996.</div>
<div>Porter, Michael and Claas van der Linde. “Green and Competitive.” Harvard Business Review (Sept./Oct. 1995): 120-134.</div>
<div>Porter, Michael and Claas van der Linde. “Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (Fall 1995): 97-118.</div>
<div>Repetto, Robert. Jobs, Competitiveness and Environmental Regulation: What Are the Real Issues? Washington, DC, World Resources Institute, March 1995.</div>
<div><strong>About the Endangered Species Act&#8230;</strong></div>
<div>Barker, Rocky. Saving All the Parts: Reconciling Economics and the Endangered Species Act. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1993.</div>
<div>Ehrlich, Paul and Anne. “Biodiversity and the Brownlash.” Defenders (Fall, 1996): 6-17.</div>
<div>Freudenburg, William, Lisa Wilson &amp; Daniel O’Leary. “Forty Years of Spotted Owls? A Longitudinal Analysis of Logging Industry Job Losses.” Sociological Perspectives 41 (1998): 1-26.</div>
<div>Meyer, Stephen. Endangered Species Listings and State Economic Performance. Project on Environmental Politics &amp; Policy, MIT (March 1995).</div>
<div>Morrison, Peter, et al. Ancient Forests in the Pacific Northwest. Washington, DC: The Wilderness Society, 1991. (This is the best, most comprehensive survey to determine how much old-growth forest is left. Unfortunately, there is even less today than when this study was done.)</div>
<div>Seideman, David. “Out of the Woods.” Audubon (July-Aug. ‘96): 66-75. U.S. Fish &amp; Wildlife Service. Facts About the Endangered Species Act. Washington, DC: July 1995. (This is an unfortunately obscure publication in which FWS investigated 34 “horror stories” and gives its responses. They clearly show how grossly distorted the tales were, even when there was some real event behind a story.)</div>
<div align="center">
<hr align="center" size="2" width="100%" />
</div>
<div>Long-time Green Elephant readers will recognize <strong>John R. E. Bliese, Ph.D.</strong> as the author of “<a href="http://www.rep.org/news/GEvol1/ge1.3_John.Bliese.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;">Conservative Principles and the Environment</span></a>.&#8221; That article, first published in The Green Elephant, has since been reprinted in newspapers and newsletters around the country. He also published a much longer (52-page) monograph on the same topic, “Conservative Principles and Environmental Policies,” in the Spring 1998 issue of The Kansas Journal of Law and Public Policy.</div>
<div>Professor Bliese, who teaches communications at Texas Tech University in Lubbock, is working on a book about conservatism and environmental policies. As before, we thank him for writing this fine article especially for The Green Elephant.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wvgreenworks.org/the-great-environment-versus-economy-myth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
